[Dave Murphy]

Once you get rid of the Orgs, then most of these other problems take care of themselves.

[TysonJones]

Originally Posted by TysonJones

All fights would be 60/40 in favor of the winner.

All champions with belts must fight at least 3 times a year.

More networks covering boxing.

Get rid of at least half the ppv fights.

8 oz gloves for everyone.

No ringside judges or ref's over the age of 50.

Originally Posted by Dave Murphy

Once you get rid of the Orgs, then most of these other problems take care of themselves.

Thats what I was about to add to my list lol.

[LeedsLad]

Originally Posted by bweisman12

That's making us watch fights like Pavlik/Rubio and Cotto/Jennings. Either get rid of the mandatories or make the mandatories make some sort of sense.

Thats why there should be only one champ. Then the better fighters are high up the rankings and get the title shots. Obviously the one organisation would have to be independant and unbias.

[NFFC]

Originally Posted by TysonJones

All fights would be 60/40 in favor of the winner.

All champions with belts must fight at least 3 times a year.

More networks covering boxing.

Get rid of at least half the ppv fights.

8 oz gloves for everyone.

No ringside judges or ref's over the age of 50.

I was surprised you said that one.

[Captainobvious]

Originally Posted by Tomasz79

Here`s what I would:

1. Two champions per division.
2. Possibility of unification bout resulting in superchampion.
3. Fighter`s have less saying in who they fight if they are on the top.
4. Every judge has a close family person kidnapped during fight and hung over a shark pool, and after each fight fans vote if particular judges scoring was fair. If more than 50% fans will vote "unfair" - said judges relative goes for a swim.
5. Women boxing is allways topless.

Careful what you wish for...have you seen some of the female boxers out there...?

[Balistik]

Judges need to be really experienced so 40 or 50 should be a minimum lol. Why not let the ref judge the fight like in the old days.

[NFFC]

Originally Posted by Captainobvious

Careful what you wish for...have you seen some of the female boxers out there...?

Originally Posted by Balistik

Judges need to be really experienced so 40 or 50 should be a minimum lol. Why not let the ref judge the fight like in the old days.

That's what I thought, although I can see both sides.

[TysonJones]

Originally Posted by NFFC

I was surprised you said that one.

Why? I dont have a huge problem with the way things are now but I like my refs and judges to be old enough to understand the business and not to old so they can't even see whats going on. I'm tired of these 70 year old men who ref and judge fights, its just not right nor fair. Nothing against old people but eyesight and perception change over time. Boxing needs youth, always has and always will.

[Tomasz79]

Originally Posted by Captainobvious

Careful what you wish for...have you seen some of the female boxers out there...?

Yeah I was a bit quick with this one. On the othar hand, might just skip watching the fights with uggos

[BDUB2112]

Originally Posted by LeedsLad

Thats why there should be only one champ. Then the better fighters are high up the rankings and get the title shots. Obviously the one organisation would have to be independant and unbias.

That's the issue. I don't think that's possible.