Ezzard Charles - Boxing Forum - Boxing Discussion Forums
Boxing History Discuss Historical Boxing In This Section.

Reply

Old 07-10-2009, 12:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
Spike Spiegel
 
Sweet Pea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Posts: 7,079
Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game
Ezzard Charles

Ezzard Charles: Subtle Greatness (By: Greg Smith - 2005)

Quote:
Greatness is a word used too often in boxing. For instance, Corrales vs. Castillo was a great fight, but are Corrales and Castillo great fighters? In my opinion, they showed elements of greatness in their epic war, but the true test of greatness entails that a fighter puts up great performances against great fighters over a long period of time. It remains to be seen how long Corrales and Castillo will last in this game, and whether either can be appropriately deemed great fighters by the end of their careers.

Muhammad Ali crowned himself “The Greatest” early in his career, and he proved it over the long haul. He was the first three-time heavyweight champion, and defeated the best of heavyweights of the 1960s and 1970s in some of the most famous bouts in history.

Ali also met the best heavyweight of the 1980s: Larry Holmes. Holmes was a former sparring partner for Ali, and it was a sad September night when the shell of Ali was dominated by Holmes. From that time on, Larry Holmes became a great fighter as well, but he suffered from a syndrome first manifested thirty years before Holmes defeated Ali: The Ezzard Charles Syndrome.

When Ezzard Charles easily outboxed Joe Louis for the heavyweight crown in 1950, he was almost never forgiven for it. It simply didn’t matter how beautifully Charles feinted, countered, slipped, and jabbed. What mattered is that the public wanted a dynamic champion who transcended the sport, and Charles was too subtle and pure a sweet scientist to capture the public’s imagination.

Born into poverty in Georgia on July 7, 1921, Charles’ family moved to Cincinnati, Ohio when he was a youngster. Ezzard Charles was almost a natural born fighter. As a teenager, Charles took up boxing and was undefeated as an amateur with a record of 42-0.

Charles turned pro on March 15, 1940 as a middleweight with a third round knockout of Medley Johnson in Middletown, Pennsylvania. Fourteen months later, Charles had already compiled a record of 21-0 with 15 KOs.

Like many of fighters of the 1940s, Charles was thrown in against experienced and accomplished opposition early in his career. In Charles’ twenty-second pro fight, he was matched with former middleweight champion Ken Overlin. Overlin was a veteran of 140 pro fights and fought a who’s who of the middleweight division since the 1930s. He outpointed the nineteen-year-old Charles over ten rounds in Charles’ hometown of Cincinnati.

After losing to Overlin, Charles jumped right back into the fray. A few months after losing to Overlin, Charles won a ten round decision over former champion Teddy Yarosz, and then knocked out light heavyweight contender Anton Christoforidis on January 12, 1941. Six months before being knocked out by Charles, Christoforidis lost a fifteen round decision to future undisputed light heavyweight champion Gus Lesnevich.

Charles reputation was growing, and even though he was experiencing difficulty making the 160 pound limit, some were wondering if the precocious star would land a title shot in the near future.

In 1942, all questions about Charles’ prowess were answered. The Cincinnati Cobra was matched in back-to-back bouts with the great Charley Burley. Burley was feared, avoided, and revered during his career. Burley made a habit of beating bigger men, and he was the pure acid test for the young superstar.

Both of the Burley vs. Charles bouts occurred in Burley’s hometown of Pittsburgh. The first bout occurred on May 25, 1942.

The second bout was on June 29, 1942. Burley was a 3½ to 1 favorite for the first bout. The twenty-four-year-old Burley was a veteran of almost sixty fights at the time they met, and was on a twenty bout winning streak. Charles scaled 161½ pounds, and Burley weighed 155. The bout occurred on the undercard of Fritzie Zivic’s ruthless tenth round stoppage of former lightweight champion Lew Jenkins.

Charles easily defeated Burley in the first bout. In his great book, Charley Burley: The Life and Hard Times of an Uncrowned Champion, Allen Rosenfeld gives Pittsburgh Press reporter Bill McElwain’s account of the action:

“Charles started out by staggering Burley with a right to the mouth in the opening session, and although the second was even, Burley didn’t take a round until the fifth. Charles smashed home two hard left hooks in the bristling fourth that had Burley hanging on.

“In the fifth and six (sic) Burley went to work and cut inside of his opponent’s mouth, but was just about finished after that. Ezzard came back to belt Burley dizzy with right across (sic) and a right uppercut in the seventh, and Charley was in plenty of trouble.

“Burley went out for the knockout in the tenth but ran into a right hook that dropped him to one knee. Charles had started another punch and couldn’t stop it before striking Burley while he was on the way to the canvas. Burley got up at three but the fight was over then.”

Charles won a huge ovation from Burley’s hometown crowd. Rosenfeld reported that Charles was elevated to the number three slot in the middleweight rankings while Burley dropped to fourth.

For the second bout, Charles scaled 160, and Burley came in at 151. The odds for the bout were about even. Just six days before the rematch, Burley won a ten round decision over the slick and crafty Holman Williams in Cincinnati. Nevertheless, Burley announced that he was in superb condition, and would concentrate on boxing Charles instead of trying to slug with him this time around. Rosenfeld gives Sun Telegraph reporter Jimmy Miller’s account of the rematch:

“Charles won seven of the 10 rounds and Burley managed to win the second and sixth which was the best session of the battle for action. In this round Charley, who was told by his manager, Tommy O’Louglin, to cross his right when Charles dropped his left hand, caught the Cincinnati bopper with the first punch a smashing right hand to the head. The punch shook up Charles, but before Burley could make it stick Ezzard was back in stride. The opening round was even.”

Charles became the number one middleweight contender for a short time thereafter, and actually tried unsuccessfully to secure a title fight with Tony Zale. Zale, however, ended up serving our country in WWII, and the bout never materialized.

Charles moved to the light heavyweight division in late 1942, and fought three of Cleveland’s best light heavyweights in four months. On December 1, 1942 Charles distinguished himself with a ten round unanimous decision over Joey Maxim in Maxim’s hometown despite giving away eighteen pounds. Charles dropped a decision to another superb Cleveland craftsman, Jimmy Bivins, in his next bout on January 7, 1943. In his last bout before entering military service, Charles was dominated and stopped for the first time in his thirty-eight-bout career when Lloyd Marshall dropped him eight times in route to an eighth round stoppage.

Charles was inactive in 1944 and 1945 due to WWII. During Charles’ WWII stint, rumors circulated that Charles flattened Billy Conn while both were in the Army, but Charles gentlemanly denied that he and Conn ever met in the ring.

Charles returned to the light heavyweight division with a vengeance in 1946.

By all accounts, Charles was the best light heavyweight in the world after returning to action. Many historians rank him as the best light heavyweight in history, despite the fact that he was never able to gain a shot at the world light heavyweight title. Over the years, Charles’ ranking as the best light heavyweight of all time has been met with skepticism, but his accomplishments are stunning.

Charles avenged his defeat to Marshall with two knockout wins in 1946 and 1947. Charles swept three return bouts with Jimmy Bivins from 1946-1948. In the same time frame, Charles dominated Archie Moore in a three bout series, and knocked him out in their rubber match.

Ezzard Charles defeated every light heavyweight he faced in an era of great fighters. More amazingly, from 1946 until mid-1951, Charles participated in 40 bouts, and would only lose once. On July 25, 1947 Charles gave away twenty pounds in a split decision loss to heavyweight contender Elmer “Violent” Ray. Charles avenged that defeat by knocking Ray out in nine rounds the following year.

Unable to secure a title shot as a light heavyweight, Charles began campaigning as a heavyweight on a full-time basis in the late 1940s. On June 22, 1949, he decisioned Jersey Joe Walcott for the first time over fifteen rounds for the vacant National Boxing Association World Heavyweight Title. Charles would defend the title three times in the next fourteen months before facing Joe Louis for the undisputed heavyweight title on September 27, 1950 at Yankee Stadium.

Charles weighed 184½, while Louis tipped the scales at 218. Charles easily defeated the slow and aging Louis over fifteen methodical rounds. The scorecards read 10-5, 13-2 and 12-3.

Tape of the fight reveals that the scorecards were accurate, but more importantly, Charles didn’t win spectacularly. Louis was stunned a few times in the bout, but was never in serious danger. Succeeding the great, but over-the-hill Joe Louis was a huge accomplishment for a former #1 middleweight contender, but the public was looking for a more colorful, dominating presence in the ring. Like Charley Burley, Ezzard Charles was a pure sweet scientist. He was so proficient in the art that the untrained eye couldn’t appreciate the subtle brilliance of his performances. Thus, it was only inevitable that that Charles would flirt with obscurity.

Indeed, Charles proved to be an unpopular champion. He was variously described as a blown up light heavyweight and a dull fighter. He successfully defended his title four times, but fans actually yearned for yesteryear as Charles carefully dissected his challengers.

When Charles lost his title in 1951 to the man he previously defeated twice, Jersey Joe Walcott, it marked a more significant moment in boxing history than when Charles assumed the throne from Louis. Walcott became the oldest man to win the heavyweight title.

After losing the title to Walcott, Charles unsuccessfully attempted to regain the heavyweight title three times. He lost a fifteen round decision to Walcott in 1952. In 1954, Charles lost a tough fifteen round decision to Rocky Marciano, and was stopped in the eighth round by The Rock three months later. Even far past his prime, Charles gave Marciano his toughest fights. He nearly regained the title in their second bout when Marciano suffered a severely split nose, and was on the brink of defeat when he stormed back to take Charles out in the eighth round.

Like many great champions who go on too long, Charles faded into obscurity after his last title shot against Marciano. From 1955 until his retirement in 1959, Charles would fight twenty four times, and only win ten of those bouts. Indeed, the last four years of Charles’ career severely diluted his final record.

Charles’ final ledger reads 96-25-1 (58 KOs).

Several years after his retirement, Charles became afflicted with lateral sclerosis, and was paralyzed from the waist down. He was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 1970. Ezzard Charles died at the age of 53 in Chicago on May 27, 1975.

Ezzard Charles is, in my opinion, among the top five fighters of the 1940s and 1950s. This is an especially high compliment, because I believe the sport peaked in these two decades, relative to boxing technique and depth of talent. Charles was the #1 middleweight contender in the early 1940s. He beat all of the best light heavyweights of his era. He dominated two of the greatest fighters of all-time: Charley Burley and Archie Moore. When Charles was past his prime, he gave the only undefeated heavyweight champion, Rocky Marciano, his toughest fights.

One of the best sports writers in history, Red Smith, took it a step farther. “Some day, maybe, the public is going to abandon comparisons with Joe Louis and accept Ezzard Charles for what he was---the best fist-fighter of his particular time.”

More intriguing is the notion that Charles might’ve held back in some of his most noteworthy bouts. On February 20, 1948 Ezzard Charles knocked out Sam Baroudi in the tenth round of their light heavyweight bout in Chicago. Baroudi died from injuries sustained in the bout, and many believe Charles was overly cautious thereafter. The impact of Baroudi’s death on Charles’ psyche might explain why he was less than dynamic when he became a heavyweight champion.

Ezzard Charles was too great for his own good.
Pictures





Here is a terrific highlight video for Ezzard Charles:

Dailymotion - Ezzard Charles Greatest Hits

Ezzard Charles is in my top 5 favourite Boxers of all time. Information on him is little compared to what's available for many fighters. I rank him:

#1 all-time Light Heavyweight
#19 all-time Heavyweight

He's a terrific all rounded fighter who even when he was past his prime took Rocky Marciano to the very edge and was very close to being the first man to beat The Rock because he was on the verge of being stopped.

Some of Ezzard Charles notable victories (some are multiple):

Joe Louis, Charley Burley, Teddy Yarosz, Anton Christofordis, Joey Maxim, Jersey Joe Walcott, Jimmy Bivins, Archie Moore, Lloyd Marshall, Gus Lesnevich, Freddie Beshore, Oakland Billy Smith, Fitzie Fitzpatrick, Sam Baroudi, Joe Baksi, Lee Oma, Nick Barone, Rex Layne, Bob Satterfield, Coley Wallace, Elmer Ray and if I put even more research into it I could probably find more notable victories. If Obama ever finds the time I'd love it if you could tot up Ezzard Charles resume.

He stepped into the ring with 10 Hall of Famers, beating 8 of them (Harold Johnson & Rocky Marciano are the two he didn't beat) and had it not been for the Sam Baroudi incident and the World War, he may have gone on to achieve even more then he did.
__________________

BoxingForum Hall of Fame
Sweet Pea is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 07-10-2009, 01:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
bill1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: At my house
Posts: 9,681
bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect
Ezzard is definately underrated at times by today's generation. He is arguably the greatest lightheavyweight of all time, and can be ranked highly at heavyweight too. Bert Sugar rates him in his top 10.
__________________
MEMBER OF BOXINGFORUM.COM HALL OF FAME-JANUARY, 2008



bill1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 03:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Spike Spiegel
 
Sweet Pea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Posts: 7,079
Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game
When you say Bert Sugar ranks him in the top 10, do you mean P4P or as a HW/LHW?

You're right though, he is one of the most underrated fighters of his generation and even now he's often overlooked when people talk about great fighters. The fact that he can be ranked as a Middleweight, Light Heavyweight and Heavyweight is unbelievable.
__________________

BoxingForum Hall of Fame
Sweet Pea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 05:08 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
bill1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: At my house
Posts: 9,681
bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Pea View Post
When you say Bert Sugar ranks him in the top 10, do you mean P4P or as a HW/LHW?

You're right though, he is one of the most underrated fighters of his generation and even now he's often overlooked when people talk about great fighters. The fact that he can be ranked as a Middleweight, Light Heavyweight and Heavyweight is unbelievable.
Heavyweight. I think he was around 8 or 9.
__________________
MEMBER OF BOXINGFORUM.COM HALL OF FAME-JANUARY, 2008



bill1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 05:15 PM   #5 (permalink)
Spike Spiegel
 
Sweet Pea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Posts: 7,079
Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game
Quote:
Originally Posted by bill1234 View Post
Heavyweight. I think he was around 8 or 9.
Ah, I see. I have him at #19 (although if I done my rankings now I'd find a way to push him higher) but yeah, just goes to show that he's consistently ranked in the ATG Light Heavyweights AND Heavyweight rankings. How many fighters can brag about that sort of an achievement?
__________________

BoxingForum Hall of Fame
Sweet Pea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 06:44 PM   #6 (permalink)
Moderator
 
bill1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: At my house
Posts: 9,681
bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Pea View Post
Ah, I see. I have him at #19 (although if I done my rankings now I'd find a way to push him higher) but yeah, just goes to show that he's consistently ranked in the ATG Light Heavyweights AND Heavyweight rankings. How many fighters can brag about that sort of an achievement?
The only other one that might be considered is someone like Gene Tunney, but even there he's not as highly regarded in both of the divisions. Not even a guy like Michael Spinks is rated as an ATG in both lightheavy and heavyweight.
__________________
MEMBER OF BOXINGFORUM.COM HALL OF FAME-JANUARY, 2008



bill1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 07:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
The Professor
 
Obama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 8,572
Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise
Ring Magazine's 1998 Heavyweight Ratings:

Tunney is ranked #15.
Spinks is ranked #36.

The discrepancy in rank is due to overall achievement in the division I'm guessing because Dempsey is rated #10 while Holmes is rated #5. Spinks was past his prime when he hung it up tho...after getting blasted by Tyson. Tunney on the other hand was still prime, and flat out ducked Sharkey. If Sharkey would have blasted his ass, these rankings would be different. I have no idea who would have won that fight, but it's a crime it didn't happen.
__________________
Follow me on twitter for my YouTube uploads and more:

http://twitter.com/sweetboxing
Obama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 10:32 PM   #8 (permalink)
The Professor
 
Obama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 8,572
Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise Obama shows promise
I just read the article. It was pretty good. One major, glaring, outrageous statement in the article however:

"He beat all of the best light heavyweights of his era."

....

Harold Johnson?

That's so bad a mistake that I'm wondering if I can trust all the things he said that I didn't know about...like the description of the Burley fights.
__________________
Follow me on twitter for my YouTube uploads and more:

http://twitter.com/sweetboxing
Obama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 12:47 AM   #9 (permalink)
Moderator
 
bill1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: At my house
Posts: 9,681
bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect bill1234 is a hot prospect
That's why I much rather see the films of fights back then, many times the writers could be extremely biased and put twists and spins on them to better suit the fighter they were backing. Unfortunately, there isn't much film of the full fights from back then, and the little film that exists isn't the best.
__________________
MEMBER OF BOXINGFORUM.COM HALL OF FAME-JANUARY, 2008



bill1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 06:00 AM   #10 (permalink)
Spike Spiegel
 
Sweet Pea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Posts: 7,079
Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game Sweet Pea is a student of the game
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obama View Post
Ring Magazine's 1998 Heavyweight Ratings:

Tunney is ranked #15.
Spinks is ranked #36.

The discrepancy in rank is due to overall achievement in the division I'm guessing because Dempsey is rated #10 while Holmes is rated #5. Spinks was past his prime when he hung it up tho...after getting blasted by Tyson. Tunney on the other hand was still prime, and flat out ducked Sharkey. If Sharkey would have blasted his ass, these rankings would be different. I have no idea who would have won that fight, but it's a crime it didn't happen.
Tunney beat a past prime Dempsey and Spinks beat a past prime Holmes. You're right though, at least Spinks fought Cooney and Tyson after becoming champ, Tunney just rematched Dempsey, beat Heeney and then retired without ever fighting Tunney. What a huge shame.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obama View Post
I just read the article. It was pretty good. One major, glaring, outrageous statement in the article however:

"He beat all of the best light heavyweights of his era."

....

Harold Johnson?

That's so bad a mistake that I'm wondering if I can trust all the things he said that I didn't know about...like the description of the Burley fights.
Well it's an extract from from the Charley Burley book, so I trust that part. But yeah, Ezzard never did beat Harold Johnson (who I have ranked in my top 10 LHW), so it's a pretty bad mistake but the article itself was good.

"Ezzard Charles moved into the first rank of the nation's middleweights today through an upset conquest of Charley Burley. Charles snapped Burley's string of victories at 26 straight and he did it so convincingly that even Burley's best friends admitted he was licked. Charles won the first two rounds but when Burley came back to win the 3rd, everyone thought Charley was just cold and now warming up. In the 4th, however, Charles had Burley as close to being KO'd as any fighter can be. Burley then had his best round in the 5th when he not only took the play away from Charles but battered him from pillar to post. Burley also won the 6th using a long looping left to his advantage. Charles then stepped into the classy Burley to take the play away from him in a great fight." -Associated Press

So that is an account of the first fight I found on a Google group and I just seen that it's on Boxrec as well. Charles showed it was no fluke with the rematch..

"For the second time in less than two months, Ezzard Charles carried home to Cincinnati today the figurative scalp of Charley Burley. Burley lost by unanimous decision to the 20 year old Charles in the 10 round feature which broke all Hickey Park attendance records. A crowd of app. 4,200 turned out. With a nine pound advantage at 161, Charles proved his punching power on inside fighting and kept Burley mostly on the defensive and unable to strike a telling blow. Charles took 7 rounds, splitting 1 and giving up 2 to Burley." -United Press

So Ezzard Charles was number 1 ranked in Middleweight as well as being regarded as an all time great LHW and HW. He has an impressive resume to back it all up as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bill1234 View Post
That's why I much rather see the films of fights back then, many times the writers could be extremely biased and put twists and spins on them to better suit the fighter they were backing. Unfortunately, there isn't much film of the full fights from back then, and the little film that exists isn't the best.
Yep, and it is such a shame to be quite honest with you. Watching Corbett/Fitzsimmons on YouTube, which is dated 1894 but I can't find any fight footage for Ezzard/Burley but that's life.
__________________

BoxingForum Hall of Fame

Last edited by Sweet Pea : 07-11-2009 at 06:03 AM.
Sweet Pea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios