Originally Posted by tysonjones

well ill watch it again this evening if i get a chance, but i hardly think it was the worse robbery ever.

Originally Posted by jabutillurdown

i also think that you should have to convincingly beat the champ to win the title if the fight is really close the fight should go to the champ

Originally Posted by bill1234

IMO somebody shouldn't win a title by running and not pressing the action while the champ's pressing the action and pursuing you. When ever Larry hit Spinks with his right, Spinks got pretty hurt. Look at the rematch, you are the first person that I have come across that thinks Larry lost both fights. The rematch is known as one of the worst robberies in the history of boxing. By many, its known as a disgrace.

Originally Posted by daveDaboxingfan

That’s BS if its close give to who actually won champion or not.

Originally Posted by daveDaboxingfan

then hand in a 10/10 score card.

The perfect example of that kind of BS is JT Vs WW

Originally Posted by LeedsLad

I thought generally close rounds were given to the aggressor?