Boxing Forum - Boxing Discussion Forums banner
1 - 20 of 38 Posts
G

·
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Boxingforum's Top 10 P4P - August 2009 Voting

Hey all,
We're starting up a new P4P ranking system at boxingforum. Below are the rules/regulations (I'm hoping this will be moved up with the sticky threads shortly).

1. It will now be only the top 10 as opposed to the top 25.
2. It will be a collective effort voted on by all members/mods who wish to participate.
3. The ability to post your top 10 will be available for 5 days at the beginning of every month (starts now for August). After that, the voting is closed until the beginning of the next month. (Topic will stay open for banter).
4. Here's how the voting system works:

Every member who wants to participate posts their top 10 P4P. Their #1 fighter receives 11 points, the #2 fighter receives 10 points, down to the #10 fighter receives 2 points. At the end of the 5 day period the totals are tallied and that will be boxingforum's top 10 P4P list for that month.

The more people that participate, the more interesting the list will be so everyone please do. Thanks. :thumbsup:

Voting will be open for the next 5 days. Related P4P discussion is welcome in this thread.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
1. Manny Pacquiao
2. Floyd Mayweather
3. Juan Manual Marquez
4. Bernard Hopkins
5. Shane Mosley
6. Miguel Cotto
7. Paul Williams
8. Chad Dawson
9. Nonito Donaire
10. Arthur Abraham
 

· Banned
Joined
·
25,712 Posts
#1. Pacquiao
#2. J M Marquez
#3. Hopkins
#4. Mosley
#5. Vasquez
#6. Cotto
#7. Donaire
#8. Calderon
#9. Caballero
#10. Bradley
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Inactivity:thumbsdown:
I guess I'm the only one including Floyd. :laugh:

I agree that Vasquez and Marquez need to be removed from P4P until they fight again. By the same token, JuanMa hasn't beaten anybody worthy of grabbing him a top 10 spot. That's why Caballero doesn't make my list either.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
Manny Pacquiao
Juan Manuel Marquez
Bernard Hopkins
Shane Mosley
Israel Vazquez
Miguel Cotto
Rafa Marquez
Ivan Calderon
Nonito Donaire
Tim Bradley
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,212 Posts
1.Pacquiao
2.JMM
3.Hopkins
4.Mosley
5.Cotto
6.Williams
7.Vazquez
8.Donaire
9.W.Klitschko
10.R.Marquez

Ps. A clear victory over JMM will put Mayweather back nr.1 and if Pac wins Cotto hes nr.1 again :p
 

· Spike Spiegel
Joined
·
7,070 Posts
Looks like Boxing may have its first real P4P war for the first time in a while. Both Pacquiao and Mayweather have legitimate claims for the number one spot and the only way to settle it is to fight one another. But that won't happen because Cotto is going to knock Pacquiao out.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
Looks like Boxing may have its first real P4P war for the first time in a while. Both Pacquiao and Mayweather have legitimate claims for the number one spot and the only way to settle it is to fight one another. But that won't happen because Cotto is going to knock Pacquiao out.
Those two fights, no matter who the winners are sets up a great P4P supremacy fight.

Mayweather vs. Pacquaio
Paquaio vs. Marquez
Cotto vs. Mayweather
Cotto vs. Marquez

You just can't go wrong.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
25,827 Posts
Looks like Boxing may have its first real P4P war for the first time in a while. Both Pacquiao and Mayweather have legitimate claims for the number one spot and the only way to settle it is to fight one another. But that won't happen because Cotto is going to knock Pacquiao out.
Pac will beat Cotto.


Those two fights, no matter who the winners are sets up a great P4P supremacy fight.

Mayweather vs. Pacquaio
Paquaio vs. Marquez
Cotto vs. Mayweather
Cotto vs. Marquez

You just can't go wrong.
Even though Marquez is the better fighter P4P I can't see him winning this one.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
9,456 Posts
1. Manny Pacquiao
2. Juan Manual Marquez
3. Bernard Hopkins
4. Shane Mosley
5. Paul Williams
6. Miguel Cotto
7. Wlad Klitschko
8. Nonito Donaire
9. Chad Dawson
10. Israel Vazquez
 
1 - 20 of 38 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top