Great post bro. I agree with all of this. David Haye clowns Arreola as well.No way. He has, for the most part, been fighting no-names. The first fighter I recognize on his record is Travis Walker, and Walker knocked him down in the first. You think he can get past either Klit with that kind of carelessness? Then again, if Arreola waits a few years for those two to get old, he might stand a chance. I'd like to see him fight one of the Klits next. Throw out Rahman and insert Arreola. Rahman doesn't deserve the chance.
:facepalm:He KOs Wlad now in a fight where he's losing on all cards prior to the KO. With some more experience he /may/ be able to beat Vitali later, and by the time Vitali is 40 yrs old he'll definitely beat Vitali. I explained why he beats Wlad somewhere else...don't feel like fetching it. Arreola is the future. I would rather see him commit a 187 on Haye tho.
I offer the only opposing viewpoint in a thread of nothing but the same regurgitated opinions, don't facepalm me punk. :deadhorse::facepalm:
He has no chance, his best shot would be waitn until they get really old.
I'd like him to take on Haye or Povetkin first to see if he can hang with them. Tony Thompsom also would be a good test.
But from what I've seen, he gets KO'd by either Klitchko.
It's not about being "better". There is no better, this is a debate. A very 1 sided debate. If you want to dismiss the only opposition entirely you might as well not even post in the thread since the entire purpose of it is defeated.That doesnt make your pick any better.
Anyways, you're entitled to your own oppinion. but man...:facepalm: