he said the hatton that beat kostya in 2005 can beat any fighter today. he didnt say or imply anywhere that he cant anymore, what he means is hatton was up for that fight more than any other, the same as he would be for mayweather.prettyboywho said:Come on now lets be clear about what Sugar said. He said that the Hatton from 2005 the one that beat Kostya can beat Mayweather. I think that he clearified it like that because of the way Hatton is fighting now. I dont think that he believes that the Hatton of today can beat PBF. But befor you get all upset remember I think that Hatton can beat PBF.
so your implying that leonard thinks hatton is over the hill.prettyboywho said:I dont think he would have made sure that he said the Hatton in 2005 would beat Mayweather unless he had some kind of doubt about him now. He could have said that Hatton could beat Mayweather and thats it. But he didnt. And I didnt say that he did imply anything but if you really look at it. He really did imply. And no where can you read that he means that Hatton was up for that fight like he would be for Mayweather. He said that in 2005 Hatton was focused and in great physical shape, and could have been a problem for anyone. IN 2005
no your implying it though.prettyboywho said:No im not saying that. Im just telling what he said. Those are his words, and thats how I took them. And I do believe that the way I took them is the way he wanted them to be taken.