It wouldn't, they would have stopped it as soon as Dempsey went through the ropes because they are such wuss's now.PrettyBoyFloyd said:That was one of the ones I was thinking of. Damn, if that only happened nowadays.
It wouldn't, they would have stopped it as soon as Dempsey went through the ropes because they are such wuss's now.PrettyBoyFloyd said:That was one of the ones I was thinking of. Damn, if that only happened nowadays.
Back then they would fight twice a month, now twice a year. Back then they were tougher. Now if someone gets headbutted or hit low, they cry and cry to the ref. Back then they would hit them back. If you got your nose broken or broke your hand during the fight, you fought on. If you were on queer street, you fought right back, if you were all bloody and couldn't see you fought on. The last guy I saw do that was Ray "Boom Boom" Mancini, and he was in the 80's. Back then it wasn't uncommon at all if you fought the same guy 7 or 8 times. They didn't even start wearing mouth gards until the 20's or 30's.tysonjones said:fighters are wuss's now? please, there have been plenty heavyweights since dempsey that would of killed him.
As much as I want to disagree with that, I can't. 100%bill1234 said:Back then they would fight twice a month, now twice a year. Back then they were tougher. Now if someone gets headbutted or hit low, they cry and cry to the ref. Back then they would hit them back. If you got your nose broken or broke your hand during the fight, you fought on. If you were on queer street, you fought right back, if you were all bloody and couldn't see you fought on. The last guy I saw do that was Ray "Boom Boom" Mancini, and he was in the 80's. Back then it wasn't uncommon at all if you fought the same guy 7 or 8 times. They didn't even start wearing mouth gards until the 20's or 30's.
I can see why you would want to, but can't see why you would disagree.PrettyBoyFloyd said:As much as I want to disagree with that, I can't. 100%
bill1234 said:Back then they would fight twice a month, now twice a year. Back then they were tougher. Now if someone gets headbutted or hit low, they cry and cry to the ref. Back then they would hit them back. If you got your nose broken or broke your hand during the fight, you fought on. If you were on queer street, you fought right back, if you were all bloody and couldn't see you fought on. The last guy I saw do that was Ray "Boom Boom" Mancini, and he was in the 80's. Back then it wasn't uncommon at all if you fought the same guy 7 or 8 times. They didn't even start wearing mouth gards until the 20's or 30's.
daveDaboxingfan said:Great post bill. :thumbsup:
Yes I use cell phones. And yes, I know its 2007, and yes, I watch the fights now. And yes I know what I'm talking about post 1960. I know a lot pre 2000.PrettyBoyFloyd said:Bill it is 2007!!! LOL. Do you even use cell phones? I can't believe you use a computer either![]()
Lie comparing apples and oranges.tysonjones said:good post bill but it still doesnt mean those old fighters would be modern day fights, i just dont think it would happen. YOU SAY THE GUYS ARE tougher becaue they didnt use mouth guards and fight the same guys over and over. i bet some fighters down aday wish they didnt use mouth guards and fought the same guy over and over. Hell i wish i could and i hate my mouthpiece.
They complain now if they are fouled, even if its an accident. Back then if you got fouled, you did something worse back, or made sure you hit them right in the face. They didn't let the ref control the fight, they made sure they did.tysonjones said:good post bill but it still doesnt mean those old fighters would be modern day fights, i just dont think it would happen. YOU SAY THE GUYS ARE tougher becaue they didnt use mouth guards and fight the same guys over and over. i bet some fighters down aday wish they didnt use mouth guards and fought the same guy over and over. Hell i wish i could and i hate my mouthpiece.
Not if they lose twice in a row, after that they duck the person. Also, if the 2 fights were great fights I would pay to see it, and I'm sure many others would too.PrettyBoyFloyd said:Right back when boxing was FREE. Nobody wants to watch someone get beat twice in a row and then pay to see a third fight. I'm pretty sure when someone loses and they get a rematch they try to win still today.
If it was "sooooooooooooooooo much lower" then why is today known as the worst division yet? And why do soooooooooo many guys now-a-days try to copy their styles from back then, just they screw it up?PrettyBoyFloyd said:If you get beat by the same guy twice (TODAY!!!!!) then you clearly don't have what it takes. Back then the skill level was soooooooooooooo much lower that you always had a shot.
Watch Robinson-Baslio, Zale-Graziano, Hearns-Hagler, Tunney-Dempsey, Pep-Saddler, Holmes-Norton, Ali-Frazier. I can come up with more.tysonjones said:you obvioulsy havent seen hatton/tszyu , lol talk about coming back with something WORSE!!!