Boxing Forum - Boxing Discussion Forums banner
1 - 20 of 29 Posts

· Banned
Joined
·
25,712 Posts
ill take morrales to win this one ive never been a huge pac fan. i think if he fought the likes of barrera and morrales when they were in there primes he would lose 101 times out of 100.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,349 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
ERIK said:
Pacquiao is fighting Morales in November.
I think Morales pulls off the upset.
i am hoping for the same thing.
i would to see morales retire a champion.
then they should make an sinlge eliminator tournament for the title.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,349 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
bill1234 said:
I agree, although pac man should be inducted into the hall of fame if he doesn't mess up.

I don't know the criteria far the hall of fame.
But it should not be belts it should be dominance.
And pacman has not dominated his division.
 

· Mental Midget
Joined
·
4,194 Posts
Thats a little absurd. He fought Barrera in 2003, and Barrera was in great form. He had come off of wins against Hamed, Morales, Tapia, and Kelley before fighting pacman, and went on after that fight to win against Ayala ,Morales, Peden, and Rocky Juarez so I dont wanna hear anything about out of his prime. Barrera was arguably in the best shape of his life.

Barrera and Morales were tops in the division when manny fought them, so nothing can be diminished from those victories. Oh and for the record, Manny will wipe up Morales again
 

· Mental Midget
Joined
·
4,194 Posts
tommygunn said:
ill take morrales to win this one ive never been a huge pac fan. i think if he fought the likes of barrera and morrales when they were in there primes he would lose 101 times out of 100.
Sorry, I meant to link this in my post above.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,109 Posts
Captainobvious99 said:
Thats a little absurd. He fought Barrera in 2003, and Barrera was in great form. He had come off of wins against Hamed, Morales, Tapia, and Kelley before fighting pacman, and went on after that fight to win against Ayala ,Morales, Peden, and Rocky Juarez so I dont wanna hear anything about out of his prime. Barrera was arguably in the best shape of his life.

Barrera and Morales were tops in the division when manny fought them, so nothing can be diminished from those victories. Oh and for the record, Manny will wipe up Morales again

I agree about they where in their primes or at least close enough.

I dont agree that Pacquiao will wipe up Morales again.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
25,712 Posts
daveDaboxingfan said:
I don't know the criteria far the hall of fame.
But it should not be belts it should be dominance.
And pacman has not dominated his division.
pacman has been the #1 champ at flyweight, super bantumweight and super featherweight.

i will say though that i do think erik will beat him in a ud when they fight.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
25,712 Posts
Captainobvious99 said:
Thats a little absurd. He fought Barrera in 2003, and Barrera was in great form. He had come off of wins against Hamed, Morales, Tapia, and Kelley before fighting pacman, and went on after that fight to win against Ayala ,Morales, Peden, and Rocky Juarez so I dont wanna hear anything about out of his prime. Barrera was arguably in the best shape of his life.

Barrera and Morales were tops in the division when manny fought them, so nothing can be diminished from those victories. Oh and for the record, Manny will wipe up Morales again
marco had been fighting from the age of 15 so his prime would be about 26 or 27 just when he beat hamed.

as i said if marco had been in that kind of forum against pac he would have won nearly every round.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,349 Posts
Discussion Starter · #19 ·
tommygunn said:
marco had been fighting from the age of 15 so his prime would be about 26 or 27 just when he beat hamed.

as i said if marco had been in that kind of forum against pac he would have won nearly every round.
Great point dude
 
1 - 20 of 29 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top